There are no shortcuts to wealth creation. It’s about doing the right things at the right times, over and over again. We don’t believe in cutting corners or compromising on our values for short term gains.

May 17, 2017

Solving the Naspers problem

Of the 173 actively-managed funds in the South African general equity category, 129 use either the FTSE/JSE All Share Index (Alsi) or the FTSE/JSE Shareholder Weighted All Share Index (SWIX) as their benchmarks. These make sense as broad benchmarks that cover the most investable part of the market.

However, in recent years some investors have grown increasingly concerned about the way these indices have started to look. The incredible growth in the value of Naspers has meant that a very large part of both the Alsi and the SWIX are now concentrated in a single stock.

This represents a problem that the bourse has looked to address through the development of capped indices. Both the Alsi and the SWIX now have variants that limit the weight of a single stock to 10%.

As the tables below show, this has a large impact on the way these indices look.


Source: JSE


Note: The 10% cap is flexible within limits, which is why Naspers is still above that number in both indices.

The question for fund managers is whether these capped indices are better benchmark options than the traditional Alsi and SWIX. Coronation Fund Managers chose to benchmark both its Equity and Top 20 funds against the Capped Alsi nearly two years ago, while more recently Fairtree Capital and Excelsia adopted the Capped SWIX.

So far, these are the only managers to have taken this option, but it may well become more prevalent.

“I think that the JSE has responded to a concern from the investor base that the single stock risk in Naspers has become too large,” explains Rademeyer Vermaak, a fund manager at Fairtree Capital. “This is not at all a view on Naspers as a company, but the purpose of a benchmark should be a diversified portfolio and it shouldn’t be exposed to a single stock to such a large extent.”

He says that the fundamental reason for this is risk management. If a benchmark represents an investable alternative against which a manager is measured, then it makes sense that it should have risk and return characteristics similar to those the fund manager is willing to employ. If a manager would never consider putting 20% of their portfolio into a single stock, then is it reasonable for them to use a benchmark where that is the case?

As the table below indicates, capping the indices does make a difference to their level of concentration. Most obviously, the Capped SWIX is significantly more diversified than the Alsi.

Source: JSE

This would seem to make the Capped SWIX a more useful benchmark, but as the head of personal investments at Coronation, Pieter Koekemoer, points out, the SWIX has other problems that informed his firm’s decision to move away from it.

“The fundamental problem we have with SWIX is that it has what we believe to be a spurious differentiation between different types of dual-listed shares,” he says. “For companies with primary listings elsewhere, their treatment depends on the origin of the shares.”

Companies like Anglo American and Old Mutual that were initially listed on the JSE but moved their primary listing elsewhere are still treated the same as local listings. However other inward listings, like BHP Billiton or Anheuser-Busch Inbev (AB Inbev) are only partially counted based on the value of their shares listed on the JSE.

“These are companies with huge market caps, but they are heavily down-weighted or not even included in the SWIX because the South African holding is too small,” says Koekemoer. “That has created a situation where a few South African companies, specifically Naspers, have become incredibly large. Naspers, which has a market cap of roughly R1 trillion is now more than 20% of the SWIX, while AB Inbev, with a market cap of around R3 trillion, is not included at all.”

This is more an issue for large managers than smaller ones, as a firm the size of Coronation has the ability to invest in AB Inbev or BHP Billiton elsewhere and move those shares onto the South African share register. So the value of the locally-listed shares is fairly irrelevant, which is why Coronation opted to use the Capped Alsi.

One fundamental question that remains is whether capping the benchmarks has a significant impact on their returns. As the chart below shows, over the last five years the indices and their capped variants have really moved very much in line.

The capped Alsi has outperformed marginally, mostly one suspects due to the recent strength in Richemont’s share price, while the Capped SWIX has slightly underperformed. This is important as there should not be an incentive for fund managers to choose one or the other based on which they are more likely to be able to outperform.

By: Patrick Cairns (Moneyweb)




Nov 22, 2019

Is now the time to reconsider hedge Funds?

It is time to reconsider hedge funds’ rightful position in providing diversification in a client’s investment portfolio


Jun 19, 2019

Income funds are critical building blocks of a balanced fund

Published on Moneyweb 29 May 2019.


Jun 10, 2019

Multi Asset Class Fund

Published on Moneyweb 28 May 2019



Investors should take cognisance of the fact that there are risks involved in buying or selling any financial product and that past performance of a financial product is not necessarily indicative of its future performance. The value of financial products can increase as well as decrease over time, depending on the value of the underlying securities and market conditions. 

Hedge funds are portfolios of collective investment schemes and are regulated under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, 45 of 2002. Investments in portfolios of collective investment schemes are generally medium to long term investments. Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and may engage in scrip lending and borrowing. The manager of a collective investment scheme may close a portfolio to new investors in order to manage the portfolio more efficiently in terms of its mandate.

The information and documentation presented on this site do not constitute a solicitation, invitation or investment recommendation. Prior to selecting a financial product or fund it is recommended that investors seek specialised financial, legal and tax advice. Fairtree Asset Management (Pty) Ltd accepts no liability of any kind resulting from reliance being placed on any information contained on this website. Fairtree Asset Management (Pty) Ltd endeavours to provide accurate and timely information, but makes no representation or warranty as to the correctness, accuracy, completeness or suitability of any of the information contained on this website. The laws of the Republic of South Africa shall govern any claim relating to or arising from the contents of this website.


Yes, Please Proceed    Sorry I cannot Accept Terms
Please note : South Africa is still on a partial COVID-19 lockdown. Please contact us on for an urgent response to your query.